🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.